ext_304648 ([identity profile] marina-bonomi.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] nekosensei 2010-04-16 06:56 am (UTC)

Don't twist my words. It is still child abuse, if the abused party is below the age of consent, but if both parties are of the same sex it *is* homosexual.Priests don't live in reclusion, if one (and don't mistake me, it's morally wrong)looks for sex, they *can* find women as easily as men, if women are what they look for (and I said 'women' and 'men' not minors of either sex are intended or implied).

As to the other, what else is new? There are always been scandals and power-hungry elements in the church as in any other institution composed by people, that is definitely wrong and must be curbed, but if you expect to find a perfect institution anywere, good luck to you.

And before anything I said got twisted again, no, corrupted priests, immoral priests and most definitely child abusers of any kind aren't remotely tolerable in my book, but I've known too many good priests in my life, people who took and take their call seriously and work towards the good of everyone to throw they all in the same heap.

And that's really all I've to say on this matter, take it or leave it.


Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting